|
Post by jurysout on Jul 6, 2012 14:25:22 GMT -5
Remember there were no questions asked about if any items of her had been found. Actually, now that I think of it there were a number of questions not asked that may of elicited some additional information. That's a good point. Maybe her stuff was at his house or in the truck. What kind of dumbass would dump the bike and keep stuff? And why not drive the bike all the way to Texas with a tarp over it? Why didn't he STAY in Texas?
|
|
|
Post by LadyBlue on Jul 6, 2012 14:25:49 GMT -5
Well they had better have some solid evidence or information to get that murder rap to stick.
|
|
|
Post by jurysout on Jul 6, 2012 14:33:42 GMT -5
Between the Circle K, St Mary & the Coliseum. So, on or off of St Landry. Lots of trees around Henry Street 1038. Would be dark at night. =\ Also lots of trees around the access ramp I've been haunting. I think the mention of St Mary & the Coliseum is significant. I agree. Especially since we know that there was a sealed off search by LE with dogs. It was the only area sealed off in the area that anyone recalls from the messages I received. So, LE knew a lot of stuff from the jump, do you think? The more I think about the presser and 6 weeks of round and round questions, the more stuff I think was unsatisfactorily and obtusely verified. It WAS a bump & grab...or why the bite mark question? He followed her down St Landry and she could have been anybody. How long was she aware of him, I wonder. Did he go around the block? Cut her off? You'd think if she'd been aware, she might have cut through a yard and dug out her phone. IDK. I've never been in that position. But she was familiar with the route and comfortable with her bike. If she knew he was there, she would have lost him, I think.
|
|
|
Post by LadyBlue on Jul 6, 2012 14:34:16 GMT -5
My daughter is asking about signing up on here too. I didn't know if we were accepting anymore people on here. Just give me a name to watch for and I will approve her also.
|
|
|
Post by Allusonz on Jul 6, 2012 14:36:33 GMT -5
Remember there were no questions asked about if any items of her had been found. Actually, now that I think of it there were a number of questions not asked that may of elicited some additional information. That's a good point. Maybe her stuff was at his house or in the truck. What kind of dumbass would dump the bike and keep stuff? And why not drive the bike all the way to Texas with a tarp over it? Why didn't he STAY in Texas? All I know is that a police chief does not go to crime scenes normally unless there is something there. Prvate DNA labs can do faster turnaround times but to state that this is the norm is not realistic unless you pay the big bucks. Many times those as well are not mixed samples as mainly they are dealing with paternity issues etc. This as well opens up some additional places to search. Previously, it was areas that Mickey would be known to go. A perp usually goes to his comfort areas. The gps on the vehicle is probably a wealth of information.
|
|
|
Post by schmidty on Jul 6, 2012 14:37:11 GMT -5
I agree. Especially since we know that there was a sealed off search by LE with dogs. It was the only area sealed off in the area that anyone recalls from the messages I received. So, LE knew a lot of stuff from the jump, do you think? The more I think about the presser and 6 weeks of round and round questions, the more stuff I think was unsatisfactorily and obtusely verified. It WAS a bump & grab...or why the bite mark question? He followed her down St Landry and she could have been anybody. How long was she aware of him, I wonder. Did he go around the block? Cut her off? You'd think if she'd been aware, she might have cut through a yard and dug out her phone. IDK. I've never been in that position. But she was familiar with the route and comfortable with her bike. If she knew he was there, she would have lost him, I think. Yet we have no pic of him following her down st landry ....and I am still wondering if that was him we can see faintly behind her on Versailles.
|
|
|
Post by jujube on Jul 6, 2012 14:42:54 GMT -5
So, LE knew a lot of stuff from the jump, do you think? The more I think about the presser and 6 weeks of round and round questions, the more stuff I think was unsatisfactorily and obtusely verified. It WAS a bump & grab...or why the bite mark question? He followed her down St Landry and she could have been anybody. How long was she aware of him, I wonder. Did he go around the block? Cut her off? You'd think if she'd been aware, she might have cut through a yard and dug out her phone. IDK. I've never been in that position. But she was familiar with the route and comfortable with her bike. If she knew he was there, she would have lost him, I think. Yet we have no pic of him following her down st landry ....and I am still wondering if that was him we can see faintly behind her on Versailles. I was wondering that too, schmidty. Is ST. Landry heavily traveled at that time of night with kids leaving bars? If not, then to me it would make sense that he followed her. If it is popular, he could have been waiting for a victim.
|
|
|
Post by jurysout on Jul 6, 2012 14:45:00 GMT -5
So, LE knew a lot of stuff from the jump, do you think? The more I think about the presser and 6 weeks of round and round questions, the more stuff I think was unsatisfactorily and obtusely verified. It WAS a bump & grab...or why the bite mark question? He followed her down St Landry and she could have been anybody. How long was she aware of him, I wonder. Did he go around the block? Cut her off? You'd think if she'd been aware, she might have cut through a yard and dug out her phone. IDK. I've never been in that position. But she was familiar with the route and comfortable with her bike. If she knew he was there, she would have lost him, I think. Yet we have no pic of him following her down st landry ....and I am still wondering if that was him we can see faintly behind her on Versailles. If he went around the block and came up behind her later, it could have been any side street. I hope all of this video/photo stuff is eventually revealed.
|
|
|
Post by whoknew on Jul 6, 2012 14:47:20 GMT -5
Do you believe they do not have the results back on the bike? I know they said they don't - but do you believe that?
|
|
|
Post by schmidty on Jul 6, 2012 14:48:30 GMT -5
Yet we have no pic of him following her down st landry ....and I am still wondering if that was him we can see faintly behind her on Versailles. I was wondering that too, schmidty. Is ST. Landry heavily traveled at that time of night with kids leaving bars? If not, then to me it would make sense that he followed her. If it is popular, he could have been waiting for a victim. Craft specifically said he followed her ...and no, I wouldn't think it was that crowded then.
|
|
|
Post by LadyBlue on Jul 6, 2012 14:48:47 GMT -5
Possible white truck following MickeyAttachments:
|
|
|
Post by schmidty on Jul 6, 2012 14:49:40 GMT -5
Do you believe they do not have the results back on the bike? I know they said they don't - but do you believe that? I just can't imagine any scenario in which they don't have the results back ...and haven't for a while.
|
|
|
Post by LadyBlue on Jul 6, 2012 14:50:25 GMT -5
Another one from street levelAttachments:
|
|
|
Post by jurysout on Jul 6, 2012 14:51:00 GMT -5
Do you believe they do not have the results back on the bike? I know they said they don't - but do you believe that? I don't believe it. But I suppose if it was a complicated something, it might take longer.
|
|
|
Post by jujube on Jul 6, 2012 14:52:34 GMT -5
I was wondering that too, schmidty. Is ST. Landry heavily traveled at that time of night with kids leaving bars? If not, then to me it would make sense that he followed her. If it is popular, he could have been waiting for a victim. Craft specifically said he followed her ...and no, I wouldn't think it was that crowded then. Thanks, my brain is on overload.
|
|
|
Post by schmidty on Jul 6, 2012 14:52:38 GMT -5
Possible white truck following Mickey Yep. That may well be him right there. If so, he turned behind her on St John, followed her through that intersection on Univ and St Landry and they have a pic of him behind her in the CircleK area that was not released, probably ao as not to tip him off that they knew he was specifically following her. They probably also have a much better pic of him on Versailles. The way they did it, he is just one of three trucks, all of whom may only be wanted as witnesses to what happened.
|
|
|
Post by whoknew on Jul 6, 2012 14:52:37 GMT -5
Do you believe they do not have the results back on the bike? I know they said they don't - but do you believe that? I just can't imagine any scenario in which they don't have the results back ...and haven't for a while. I thought they could have answered the question regarding them as "we can't discuss the results" rather than "we haven't received the results yet". I'm probably looking too deep into this, but it just doesn't make sense. But then - what has in this case?
|
|
|
Post by Allusonz on Jul 6, 2012 14:53:21 GMT -5
I would think they would have them back.
What I am thinking is probably they were dealing with minute amounts of trace forensics as well as mixed profiles. This would require a different lab with specific ventilation system, entry/exit procedures.
As well there could of been other forensics like fibers which would mean different experts being involved. This takes longer as each is an expert in a particular field. We also don't know how many people handled that bike. If they had to rule out others again that takes time and additional controls to make sure that it did not arise from contamination if it was LCN DNA as I believe it was.
|
|
|
Post by LadyBlue on Jul 6, 2012 14:54:01 GMT -5
Still not certain just what we might see in this pictureAttachments:
|
|
|
Post by whoknew on Jul 6, 2012 14:55:46 GMT -5
Possible white truck following Mickey In this picture, it looks like something has been whited out - I know we talked about that earlier. Could it be the white truck parked on the side of the road? Or maybe BSL standing next to the truck?
|
|
|
Post by jurysout on Jul 6, 2012 14:57:11 GMT -5
Another one from street level Wow, that's so much better. thanks.
|
|
|
Post by whoknew on Jul 6, 2012 14:57:59 GMT -5
I would think they would have them back. What I am thinking is probably they were dealing with minute amounts of trace forensics as well as mixed profiles. This would require a different lab with specific ventilation system, entry/exit procedures. As well there could of been other forensics like fibers which would mean different experts being involved. This takes longer as each is an expert in a particular field. We also don't know how many people handled that bike. If they had to rule out others again that takes time and additional controls to make sure that it did not arise from contamination if it was LCN DNA as I believe it was. OK - Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by jurysout on Jul 6, 2012 14:58:32 GMT -5
Craft specifically said he followed her ...and no, I wouldn't think it was that crowded then. Thanks, my brain is on overload. IKR?! I keep file searching my brain for snippets of stuff that aligns with the presser. And now I have to go meet the AC repair people and act like I'm totally present.
|
|
|
Post by Allusonz on Jul 6, 2012 14:58:56 GMT -5
Do you believe they do not have the results back on the bike? I know they said they don't - but do you believe that? It was my impression he was referring to the forensics collected from the house not the bike at that point.
|
|
|
Post by LadyBlue on Jul 6, 2012 15:00:15 GMT -5
I'm not certain what's in these pictures, but my guess is a whole lot more than we are aware of.
|
|